Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
BMC Geriatr ; 23(1): 228, 2023 04 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2298381

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUNDS: To investigate the relationship between obesity and 30-day mortality in a cohort of older hospitalized COVID-19 inpatients. METHODS: Included patients were aged 70 years or more; hospitalized in acute geriatric wards between March and December 2020; with a positive PCR for COVID-19; not candidate to intensive care unit admission. Clinical data were collected from patients electronic medical records. Data on 30-day mortality were retrieved from the hospital administrative database. RESULTS: Patients included (N = 294) were on average 83.4 ± 6.7 years old, 50.7% were women, and 21.7% were obese (BMI > 30 kg/m2). At 30-day, 85 (28.9%) patients were deceased. Compared to survivors in bivariable analysis, deceased patients were older (84.6 ± 7.6 vs 83.0 ± 6.3 years), more frequently with very complex health status (63.5% vs 39.7%, P < .001), but less frequently obese (13.4% vs 24.9%, P = .033) at admission. Over their stay, deceased patients more frequently (all P < .001) developed radiologic signs of COVID-19 (84.7% vs 58.9%), anorexia (84.7% vs 59.8%), hypernatremia (40.0% vs 10.5%), delirium (74.1% vs 30.1%), and need for oxygen (87.1% vs 46.4%) compared to survivors. In multivariable analysis that controlled for all markers of poor prognosis identified in bivariable analysis, obese patients remain with 64% (adjOR 0.36, 95%CI 0.14-0.95, P = .038) lower odds to be deceased at 30-day than non-obese patients. CONCLUSIONS: In this population of older COVID-19 inpatients, an inverse association between obesity and 30-day mortality was observed even after adjusting for all already-known markers of poor prognosis. This result challenges previous observations in younger cohorts and would need to be replicated.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , Aged , Female , Aged, 80 and over , Male , Risk Factors , Hospitalization , Obesity , Hospitals
2.
BMJ Open ; 13(3): e067167, 2023 03 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2270914

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate older people's experience of a COVID-19 partial lockdown (16 March-11 May 2020) in Lausanne, Switzerland. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Community-dwelling participants of the Lausanne cohort (Lc65+) in 2020, aged 71-86 years (n=2642). DESIGN AND OUTCOME: This cross-sectional study was nested within the Lc65+ longitudinal study. A specific COVID-19 questionnaire was sent on 17 April 2020 to evaluate participants' experience of the lockdown (outcome). Multinomial logistic regression models were used to determine the sociodemographic, living environment, health and social factors associated. RESULTS: Out of 2642 participants, 67.8% described the lockdown as 'somewhat' difficult (reference group), 21.5% as 'not at all' difficult (positive) and 10.7% as 'very or extremely' difficult (negative). The relative risk of a positive experience was higher in participants living alone (relative risk ratio, RRR=1.93, 95% CI 1.52 to 2.46) or in a house (RRR=1.49, 1.03 to 2.16); lower in those who reported fear of falling (RRR=0.68, 0.54 to 0.86), functional difficulties (RRR=0.78, 0.61 to 0.99), feeling of loneliness (RRR=0.67, 0.49 to 0.91), unfamiliarity with communication technologies (RRR=0.69, 0.52 to 0.91), usual social support (RRR=0.71, 0.50 to 0.93), previous participation in group activities (RRR=0.74, 0.59 to 0.92) and among women (RRR=0.75, 0.59 to 0.95). The relative risk of a negative experience was higher in participants with fear of falling (RRR=1.52, 1.07 to 2.15), and lower in those who had a terrace/garden (RRR=0.66, 0.44 to 0.99) and owned a dog (RRR=0.32, 0.11 to 0.90). CONCLUSIONS: Only one in 10 participants experienced the lockdown as very or extremely difficult. Specific interventions targeting vulnerability factors, such as fear of falling, could lessen the impact of any future similar situation.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , Female , Animals , Dogs , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Cross-Sectional Studies , Longitudinal Studies , Switzerland/epidemiology , Pandemics , Fear , Communicable Disease Control , Risk Factors
3.
Rev Med Suisse ; 18(802): 2053-2056, 2022 Nov 02.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2101104

ABSTRACT

Cerebellar ataxia can be caused by neoplasia, toxics (drugs, heavy metals, alcohol), infection, vascular lesions or auto-immune and paraneoplastic pathologies. Neuroimaging must be performed urgently in case of sudden onset and serologies as well as a lumbar puncture should be performed. Several case reports of ataxia associated with COVID-19 have been published, however the underlying pathogenic mechanisms remain unclear. This is a diagnosis of exclusion when other causes are ruled out and when the ataxia appears simultaneously to COVID-19 infection. We lack data on best management, but the prognosis appears mostly favorable with good functional recovery without any specific treatment. This paper describes the case of a patient who developed a cerebellar ataxia as the only neurological manifestation of a SARS-CoV-2 infection.


Une ataxie cérébelleuse peut être causée par un processus (para)néoplasique, auto-imun, une exposition toxique, une infection ou une lésion vasculaire. Une imagerie doit être réalisée en urgence devant toute atteinte aiguë et le bilan devrait être complété par des sérologies larges et une ponction lombaire. Plusieurs cas d'ataxie liée au Covid-19 ont été décrits, dont le mécanisme étiopathogénique reste incomplètement élucidé, le diagnostic se faisant plutôt par exclusion lorsque les symptômes apparaissent de manière concomitante à l'infection. Des données manquent sur la prise en charge mais le pronostic semble favorable, avec une bonne récupération fonctionnelle. Cet article décrit le cas d'une patiente ayant présenté une ataxie cérébelleuse comme symptôme neurologique isolé contemporain d'une infection à SARS-CoV-2.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cerebellar Ataxia , Humans , Aged , Cerebellar Ataxia/etiology , Cerebellar Ataxia/complications , COVID-19/complications , SARS-CoV-2 , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Autoantibodies
5.
Gerontol Geriatr Med ; 8: 23337214221115235, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1968532

ABSTRACT

Objectives: To determine change in (a) perceived knowledge about COVID-19 vaccines; (b) level of confidence in transmitting information about vaccines; and (c) intention to get vaccinated; among healthcare professionals (HCP) working in a Swiss academic geriatric department who attended a 30-minute information session about COVID-19 vaccines. Measurements: At the session's end, a self-administered questionnaire collected information about socio-demographics, personnel, and/or relatives' experience with COVID-19. In addition, participants were asked to rate their: (a) perceived knowledge about COVID-19 vaccines; (b) level of confidence in transmitting information about COVID-19 vaccines to patients and relatives; and (c) intention to get vaccinated; before and after the session. Results: Overall, 97 (42.2% of all HCPs) participated to 14 sessions and completed the questionnaire. Improvements were observed in knowledge, confidence in providing information, and intention to be vaccinated after the session (all p < .001). Similar improvements were observed in subgroup analyses by gender, age groups, profession (involved in direct care or not), and previous experience with COVID-19 (all p < .010). However, HCP aged 20 to 29 years were less likely to feel completely confident in providing information than those aged 30 to 49 and 50+ years (17.1% vs. 43.2% vs. 44.0%, respectively, p = .031) and to report being very likely to be vaccinated (31.4% vs. 56.8% vs. 56.0%, respectively, p = .060). Conclusions: These information sessions positively influenced HCP knowledge, confidence in providing information, and, to a lesser extent, intention to be vaccinated. Younger HCP reported similar improvements but remained less likely to consider vaccination. Additional efforts are needed to convince these undecided HCP and enhance COVID-19 vaccines uptake.

6.
Aging Clin Exp Res ; 34(9): 2245-2253, 2022 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1920349

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Loneliness and social isolation are associated with anxiety and psychological discomfort, especially amongst the oldest and fragile persons. AIMS: SILVER evaluates the acceptance of video calls by old hospitalized patients and their relatives during the ban on visits due to the COVID-19. Moreover, SILVER evaluates if the use of different communication technology is associated with different outcomes in terms of anxiety, fear of self and of others' death and mood. METHODS: SILVER is an observational multicentre study. Patients hospitalized in two geriatric units in Switzerland and in one orthogeriatric unit in Italy and their relatives were enrolled. Participants can freely choose to use phone or video calls and were evaluated over a week. We measured anxiety, fear of death and mood at baseline and at the end of the study with standard scales. The use of video or phone calls was associated to a change in these parameters by two-way ANOVA for repeated measures. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients and relatives were enrolled, 26.5% used phone calls and 73.5% video calls. The use of video calls was associated with a reduction in anxiety and fear of death in patients and relatives as compared to participants using phone calls. DISCUSSION: Old patients and their relatives accepted and appreciated the use of video calls during hospitalization; moreover, participant using video calls appears to be less anxious and less afraid of death. CONCLUSIONS: Video calls may be a useful communication tool for hospitalized older patients to keep social relationships with relatives and reduce their anxiety and fear of death. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Retrospectively registered on 1st September 2021 in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05000099).


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemics , Aged , COVID-19/epidemiology , Humans , Loneliness , Phobic Disorders , Social Isolation
7.
Geriatrics (Basel) ; 6(4)2021 Sep 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1444160

ABSTRACT

Data about outbreaks of nosocomial COVID-19 disease within geriatric rehabilitation facilities are scarce. In this retrospective case series analysis, we describe such an outbreak, determine the proportion of a-/presymptomatic patients, the median time before symptom onset among presymptomatic patients and investigate whether the viral load differs between patients with and without symptoms. Typical and atypical symptoms were retrieved from the electronic medical records of patients who tested positive for COVID-19 disease during their stay at a 95-bed geriatric rehabilitation facility. The viral load at the time of diagnosis was estimated on cycle threshold values of the rRT-PCR test. Overall, 34 patients (median age, 87 years; range, 66-98; 67% female) tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. During the same period, 19 health care workers were also diagnosed with COVID-19. Among the 27 patients who provided consent, 20 (74%) were symptomatic at the time of testing. Among the remaining seven patients, six developed symptoms after a median of 2 days. A viral load > 106 copies/mL was observed in 20 out of the 27 patients, including five out of the seven initially asymptomatic patients. The rapid transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and the prevalence of initially asymptomatic patients with high viral loads support an extended screening strategy at such facilities.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL